Skip to main content
Research methodology

How FundingRank Verifies Business Financing

Product-level facts first. FundingRank separates hard requirements from typical borrower profiles, preserves source conflicts, and does not assign one universal star score across unlike financing products.

The Research Standard

FundingRank is built around a simple rule: a clean comparison is not useful if the underlying claims are more certain than the sources justify. We prefer a qualified or missing field over a precise number that does not actually apply to the product being shown.

Claim-level evidence and review scope

Pricing, fees, repayment, liability and credit checks carry their own evidence status, source links and checked dates. Verified means a source supports that particular claim. Conditional means advertised terms depend on stated conditions. Conflicting can include a freshness discrepancy between a product page and an older retrieved document. Unverified means this review could not establish the claim, including when a page could not be retrieved. It must not be converted to Not Published. Not Reviewed is a research gap; Not Published is limited to the source and scope checked. A partial review never refreshes every fact on a product. Missing or unverified fees do not count as zero. Checking APY excludes separate savings yield and is not ranked across unlike balance tiers. Source counts document records, not product quality. Availability-unconfirmed products are labeled and excluded from default directories.

Product first, not lender-wide

Eligibility belongs to a specific product or plan. If one provider offers a 625-score weekly line and a 700-score monthly line, FundingRank shows both. We do not collapse them into “the lender requires 625.”

Hard minimums are different from typical profiles

“Minimum,” “generally approved,” “most customers,” “recommended,” and “strong applicant” are different claims. They are stored and described differently rather than converted into one required-credit field.

Conflicting provider pages stay conflicting

Providers sometimes publish different thresholds on different pages. When that happens, the conflict is part of the fact pattern. FundingRank does not silently choose the lower, newer-looking, or more convenient number.

Published pricing is different from an estimate

Factor rates, monthly interest, fixed fees, APR and total payback are not interchangeable. FundingRank preserves the provider’s pricing structure and labels any editorial conversion or estimate separately.

Unknown does not mean zero

A missing threshold is shown as not publicly stated or not established. It is not interpreted as easy qualification, poor quality, or a zero-score input.

Comparisons need compatible products

A useful ranking or “best for” conclusion should compare similar products for a stated borrower need. FundingRank does not treat easier qualification as proof that financing is better.

How We Handle Credit Requirements

Credit thresholds are especially easy to misstate because a provider may operate several products, use partner lenders, publish a typical borrower profile, or change underwriting without updating every page at once. FundingRank uses the following hierarchy.

1. Current product or plan requirementA provider page or current program document explicitly ties the threshold to the product being displayed.
2. Current provider guidanceUseful context, but labeled as typical, recommended or general when it is not a hard product minimum.
3. Partner or marketplace requirementAttributed to that partner pathway. It is not promoted to a lender-wide minimum.
4. Independent secondary sourceUsed to cross-check or fill a gap only when clearly labeled and sufficiently current.
5. Conflicting or unresolvedNo single definitive number is shown. The conflict is disclosed until it can be resolved.

The Application Privacy Grade

Application privacy remains a separate letter grade because it measures a specific operational fact: whether an application stays with one provider, can be referred, or is distributed to a network. It is not a proxy for loan quality, price or approval odds.

A

One application, one company

Contained

You apply with a single lender. That lender, or the bank it names before you sign, underwrites and funds the deal. Published material does not describe passing your application to a panel of other financing companies.

B

Direct lender, but a decline can be referred out

Direct, with a referral path

The company underwrites its own financing, but its published terms allow some applications, declines or products to be routed to outside financing providers that may contact you separately.

C

One application, many companies

Distributed

This is a marketplace or network model. A single form can be presented to multiple financing providers, each of which may retain your information and contact you independently.

Application Privacy We Currently Publish

This table is generated from the same lender records used on the reviews. Current coverage: 2 grade A, 8 grade B, 2 grade C.

Biz2CreditBDirect, with a referral path
BluevineBDirect, with a referral path
CrediblyBDirect, with a referral path
Fora FinancialBDirect, with a referral path
FundboxAContained
iBusiness FundingCDistributed
KapitusBDirect, with a referral path
LendioCDistributed
National FundingBDirect, with a referral path
OnDeckAContained
QuickBridgeBDirect, with a referral path
Rapid FinanceBDirect, with a referral path

Paying FundingRank Does Not Change the Research

FundingRank may earn referral fees and may sell clearly labeled advertising. Commercial status does not change product facts, privacy findings, editorial pros and cons, corrections, or whether a provider is included in a research comparison.

Source Priority

Current provider product pages, agreements and regulatory disclosures come first. Independent sources are used as a cross-check and must be attributed when they supply a material fact the provider does not currently publish.

Current product and eligibility pages
Rates, fees and account agreements
Terms and privacy policies
Regulatory disclosures
Current independent cross-checks
Verified borrower reports

How Borrower Reports Are Used

Borrower reports can describe what happened after an application, but they do not replace official product terms or establish a credit requirement.

VerifiedSupporting evidence materially confirms the site, timing and reported contact pattern.
Partially verifiedMeaningful corroboration exists, but not every reported detail is independently confirmed.
Unverified reportMay be retained for context, but does not contribute to aggregate contact-volume statistics.
AggregationFundingRank uses qualified reports, publishes sample size, and leaves a field blank when the sample is too small.

Questions About the Methodology

Does FundingRank give every lender one universal score?

No. Business financing products are too different for one lender-wide star score to be reliable. A line of credit, SBA loan, term loan and revenue-based financing product can have different pricing structures, underwriting rules and borrower use cases. FundingRank compares the underlying product facts instead.

What counts as a required credit score?

A credit score is presented as a requirement only when a current source ties that threshold to the specific product or plan being described. A typical borrower profile, an educational article, a partner-lender range or a statement that many customers have a certain score is not treated as a universal hard minimum.

What happens when a lender publishes conflicting requirements?

We preserve the conflict instead of selecting the number that makes the comparison look cleaner. The affected field is shown as varying, disputed or not established until the current product requirement can be verified.

How does FundingRank treat estimated APR?

An editorial APR estimate is not lender-published pricing. If FundingRank converts or estimates a cost for comparison, it must be labeled as an estimate and cannot be used as evidence that the lender publishes that APR.

Can a lender pay for better treatment?

No. Commercial relationships do not change product facts, application-privacy findings, editorial pros and cons, corrections, or the order of an editorial comparison.

How often are lender facts checked?

Each review carries a checked or reviewed date. Material corrections update the underlying record and the page. Time-sensitive terms should be rechecked against current provider material before a borrower relies on them.

Found a product term we have wrong, or two provider pages that disagree? Send the current source and we will check it against the record.

Send a Correction

Methodology updated September 30, 2026. Material future changes should be dated rather than applied retroactively without notice.